![]() ![]() For 1440p Quad HD, we were able to play GreedFall, Hitman 2, World War Z, Death Stranding, Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 at 61 fps to 66 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 64 fps.įor 2160p 4K, we were able to play Overwatch 2, Valorant at 63 fps to 133 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 98 fps. The GTX 1660 SUPER consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the GTX 1060 6GB and it really justifies an upgrade.įor 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Anthem, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II, Need For Speed: Heat, Far Cry 6, Just Cause 4 at 62 fps to 72 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 68 fps. Get faster audio encoding so you can enjoy your music sooner. Get up to 24 better frame rates in some of the most demanding games, at stunning resolutions. AMD's next-generation architecture takes 8-core processing to a new level. AMD FX 8-Core Processor, Unlocked, Black Edition. Fortunately, gaming performance was quite impressive. AMD FD8350FRHKBOX FX-8350 FX-Series 8-Core Black Edition Processor. ![]() Spec for spec, this GTX 1660 SUPER leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the GTX 1060 6GB, by boasting 35.8 % more fps. After taking the time to fully test the Turing graphics card inside the GTX 1660 SUPER, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend. NVIDIA ’s x圆0 cards have always been defined by entry-level prices with performance that knocks on the door of mid-range graphics cards – especially when overclocked. The good news is, with the release of the GTX 1660 Ti, the GTX 1660 SUPER 's price is getting more discount. The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future The higher the better.Ĭurrent CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the The higher the better.ĤK performance at 2160p resolution. The lower the better.įull HD performance at 1080p resolution. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card. Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and In comparison, Intel’s quad-core Core i5-3570K ran at 100% usage in both video-encoding and multitasking tests, leading to superior scores.The release year of the graphics card. Even during the multitasking test, which runs all our benchmarks together while playing back a high-definition video, processor usage never got above 70%. During our multi-threaded video encoding benchmark, for example, processor usage never got above 54%. ![]() The new chip is significantly faster than the old one, but most applications still don’t use it to its full potential. Unfortunately, this is still the case with the new processor. ![]() This put the FX-8150 at a disadvantage over Intel’s processors, as each individual core was slower and the advantage of having more than four cores was all but nullified by software limitations. We found that even video-encoding, which traditionally works well with multiple cores, could only use around 50% of the processor. In our tests of last year’s Bulldozer-equipped AMD FX-8150, our main criticisms revolved around the fact that few, if any, Windows programs are optimised to take advantage of so many cores. The maximum speed the processor can reach in Boost mode, where the chip can dynamically overclock where there’s enough thermal headroom, hasn’t changed, at 4.2GHz.įour sets of two Piledriver cores in AMD’s new performance chip Reply The 1050Ti is listed as the minimum required GPU. The new core has the same 32nm process but a host of microarchitecture improvements, and the maximum clock speed for the high-end chip has jumped from 3.6GHz to 4GHz. CPU: Core i5 6600K / AMD FX-8350 or similar RAM: Eight GB OS: 64-bit Windows 8. The cores themselves are updated, from last year’s “Bulldozer” to this year’s “Piledriver”. This modular approach is meant to share cache more efficiently, as each of the two cores in each module can access more level 2 cache when necessary than if the cache was split evenly across all eight cores. Each module shares a 2MB block of level 2 cache, while all four modules share an 8MB pool of level 3 cache. This has a huge eight cores, arranged in four modules of four cores each. They still use the AM3+ socket and need the AMD 970, 990X and 990FX chipsets.ĪMD sent us the high-end FX-8350 processor to test. The top-of-the-range FX-8350 and FX-8320 have eight cores, while down the range you have a six-core FX-6300 and four-core FX-4300. The new processors aren’t that much different to the older versions. There’s a clock speed boost and a new core design, which AMD hopes will start to close the performance gap between its chips and Intel’s all-conquering Core range. The FX-8350 is the first of AMD’s 2012 range of performance processors. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |